The Barts 'flank-free' modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND The last decade has seen the emergence of a variety of supine positions for carrying out percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). These positions all differ with regard to ease of puncture under image guidance, operative field availability, ability to make and dilate multiple tracts and ease of combining retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). As all of these positions have their limitations regarding the important parameters mentioned above, there is a need for a supine position which addresses some of the difficulties. METHODS We describe and illustrate our flank-free modified supine position, which we believe addresses a number of the issues. RESULTS Our position allows easy percutaneous access under fluoroscopy (torso only tilted to around 15°), space for placing (flank free of support) and dilating multiple tracts (kidney lies in a fairly neutral position and hence less mobile), a fairly horizontal tract allowing low intrarenal pressures and easy washout of fragments as well as allowing RIRS in a position of relative familiarity. The lesser torso rotation compared with the Valdivia, Galdakao modified and the Barts modified Valdivia positions also means it is more comfortable for patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results are encouraging and easily comparable with published series on prone position, Valdivia, complete supine and the Barts modified Valdivia positions. We would like to highlight the Barts 'flank-free' modified supine position as one of the standard positions for carrying out supine PCNL.
منابع مشابه
Flank free modified supine position: A new modification for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy
OBJECTIVES Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard management for large and/or complex urolithiasis, but the standard patient position for PCNL is undecided. With the patient prone PCNL has several drawbacks, while when supine, as described previously, PCNL has mechanical limitations. We describe a modification that aims to overcome these limitations and provide easy access comparab...
متن کاملPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience
OBJECTIVES To assess the outcomes of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a modified supine position, more feasible for surgeons, anaesthetists, and operating theatre staff, as well as for the patient himself, and evaluating it in comparison to the standard prone position. PATIENT AND METHODS A retrospective, case-control study was conducted between January 2011 and December 2015...
متن کاملPositions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution
OBJECTIVES To present the chronological development of the different positions described for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in an attempt to identify the reasons for their development and to highlight their specific advantages and disadvantages. METHODS Previous reports were identified by a non-systematic search of Medline and Scopus. RESULTS The classic prone position for PCNL was fi...
متن کاملWhen prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
PURPOSE To assess safety and efficacy of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients for whom prone position or general anesthesia is contraindicated or not preferable due to associated comorbidities, overweight or ipsilateral upper ureteric calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty two patients (37 males and 15 females, mean age 33 ± 10.2 years) were included in this study. Supine position wa...
متن کاملFree-flank modified supine vs. prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised trial
OBJECTIVE To compare the technical aspects, operative time, safety and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the free-flank modified supine position (FFMSP) vs. the standard prone position (SPP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients (47 men and 30 women) with renal stones were enrolled and systematically randomised into two groups, A (39 patients) treated using the FF...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Urologia internationalis
دوره 89 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012